
When a priority depends on many teams, institutions, or partners, progress rarely stalls in the plan alone.
Impact Sphere Global helps leaders see how decisions, trust, influence, contributions, and evidence shape action.
Meetings continue.
Commitments blur.
Evidence accumulates.
and
Progress stalls.

Shared priorities rarely lose momentum because people stopped caring. They stall in the work between intention and action.
Decisions lack clear owners, authority, or resources. People join the discussion but can't shape what follows. Evidence is collected, yet practice stays the same.
Impact Sphere Global helps leaders locate those gaps before they commission another strategy, add another meeting, or ask for more metrics.
Five practical questions help leaders see where to look:
Across all five, Impact Sphere Global also asks what may be limiting the work: whether practices are embedded, whether they can endure, who holds power, whether resources are sufficient, who may bear harm or burden, and how evidence is governed

Inside the institution, formal authority, budgets, staffing, routines, and accountability shape what can happen.
Across the ecosystem, partners, communities, funders, networks, and other actors make decisions and contributions that affect the same priority.
ISG looks at both settings and at the connections between them. That is often where a promising strategy either becomes coordinated work or begins to lose traction.

Impact Sphere Global works with leaders in government, higher education, NGOs and foundations, social enterprise, networks, and cross-sector initiatives. Their priorities depend on people, teams, or institutions beyond any one leader's direct control.
A good starting point
You can name one priority that matters. You need to understand why progress is stalling, not write another strategy. And you're prepared to examine evidence, disagreement, constraints, and missing perspectives honestly.
Use it to: Notice one condition that may need attention.
Evidence: One leader's structured self-report.
Output: A preliminary signal.
Use it to: Examine one bounded operating gap.
Evidence: One decision-maker and limited records.
Output: Provisional findings and next actions.
Use it to: Understand why one priority is or isn't moving.
Evidence: Several records and three perspectives.
Output: Evidence map, findings, and action plan.
Use it to: Examine a consequential priority across the full system.
Evidence: A tailored set of records and perspectives.
Output: System map and strategic action agenda.




Impact Sphere Global is building a disciplined way to examine the operating conditions that shape shared work. It draws on current research, practitioner interviews, and experience across government, higher education, international education, NGOs, and global networks.
Founded by Heather MacCleoud, Impact Sphere Global brings an institution-plus-ecosystem perspective to priorities that can't be understood from inside one organization alone.
The framework is developmental and continues to be tested and refined. Impact Sphere Global doesn't present it as a validated causal model, a certification standard, or a guarantee of outcomes.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.